Resolution: S-21-19: INCREASING HEALTH LITERACY WITH REGARDS TO COVID-19 IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC

Forums Spring 2021 Resolution Forum Resolution: S-21-19: INCREASING HEALTH LITERACY WITH REGARDS TO COVID-19 IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC

  • This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 years, 2 months ago by Briana Cervantes<br>MSUCOM.
Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3526
      Valerie Lile
      Keymaster

      WHEREAS, knowledge of the virus among the general public improves outcomes in treatment and prevention of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus1; and

      WHEREAS, health literacy regarding COVID-19 was found to be underestimated in the COVID-19 crisis1; and

      WHEREAS, it was estimated that up to 26% of the American population is considered to have low health literacy in general1; and

      WHEREAS, lack of health literacy is making it harder for adults to understand how they need to take care of themselves and others10; and

      WHEREAS, limited health literacy within migrant and homeless communities make it less likely members will understand and comply with national guidelines put forth by their local governments14; and

      WHEREAS, compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines is predicted by COVID-19 risk perception and trust in science5; and

      WHEREAS, misinformation claims are considered reliable by a significant amount of people causing risk to public health12; and

      WHEREAS, the World Health Organization has warned of an ‘infodemic’ due to widespread misinformation claims regarding the virus, how it spreads, and how to cure it12; and

      WHEREAS, Trusting COVID information sources vary by those in different demographics and beliefs2; and

      WHEREAS, a qualitative analysis of Facebook anti-vaccination groups found that these groups offer a range of narratives that blend topics such as safety concerns, conspiracy theories, alternative health and medicine including information centered around Covid-195; and

      WHEREAS, this distrust of vaccines is driven by widespread misinformation from both online sources and skeptical communities as well as physicians and scientists who promote them17; and

      WHEREAS, public confidence in vaccination is fragile and trust in science and expertise are threatened13; and

      WHEREAS, different demographic groups face barriers when trying to access information surrounding COVID-194; and

      WHEREAS, a Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that 94% of those not yet vaccinated did not have enough information about when they would be eligible or where to receive the vaccine6; and

      WHEREAS, members of the Black and Hispanic community are more likely to report they do not have enough information about the vaccine compared to their white counterparts6; and

      WHEREAS, it was also found that majority of high priority adults surveyed over 65 stated they did not have information about when and where to receive the vaccine6; and

      WHEREAS, seniors without family members to aid in their care are not able to navigate logistics of receiving the Sars-CoV-2 vaccine due to lack of access or difficulty using the internet4; and

      WHEREAS, herd immunity in regard to COVID-19 is reliant on either a mass vaccination campaign or natural global immunization over time11; and

      WHEREAS, reliance upon natural global immunization would result in increased levels of infection and death rates11; and

      WHEREAS, achieving herd immunity with a vaccine that claims 95% efficacy would require a 63% to 76% vaccination rate to achieve herd immunity11; and

      WHEREAS, overall, most Americans surveyed soon after the pandemic indicated they trust doctors9; and

      WHEREAS, greater than two thirds of Americans rate their physician’s ethical standards as “high” or “very high”13; and

      WHEREAS, only 34% of American expressed the view that they had great confidence in the leaders of the medical profession13; and

      WHEREAS, these findings point toward the idea of the general public having mistrust towards medical institutions as a whole rather than individual physicians; and

      WHEREAS, medical students have the ability to combat misinformation on social media about the COVID-19 pandemic4; and

      WHEREAS, new strategies are being used to increase physician engagement within their communities to make a positive impact on health outcomes; and

      RESOLVED, that the Student Osteopathic Medical Association (SOMA) encourage the AOA to create accessible COVID-19 related facts and provide links to legitimate articles as well as websites such as coronavirus.gov on their social media platforms for the general public to engage with and improve health literacy, and further

      RESOLVED, that the Student Osteopathic Medical Association (SOMA) distribute education resources to each COM thus allowing each COM to develop workshop events for students on the value of increasing health literacy with regards to COVID-19 as well as medicine in general to improve health outcomes among  COVID and general patient population, and further

      RESOLVED, that the Student Osteopathic Medical Association (SOMA) work with regional leaders to help distribute information to each COM about general COVID information and vaccination schedules that can then be distributed within the community the COM is located in to allow the general population to receive information from a source they are more likely to trust.

      Citations:

      1. Abdel-Latif MMM. The enigma of health literacy and COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health. 2020;185:95-96. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.030
      2. Beusekom, M. 2020. (n.d.). Trust in COVID info sources varies by demographics, beliefs. CIDRAP. Retrieved January 29, 2021, from https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/10/trust-covid-info-sources-varies-demographics-beliefs
      3. Dooling, K. (2021). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Updated Interim Recommendation for Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, December 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e2
      4. Graham, J. (2021, February 1). Older Adults Without Family or Friends Lag in Race to Get Vaccines. Kaiser Health News. https://khn.org/news/article/older-adults-without-family-or-friends-lag-in-race-to-get-vaccines/
      5. Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N., Restrepo, N. J., Leahy, R., Gabriel, N., El Oud, S., Zheng, M., Manrique, P., Wuchty, S., & Lupu, Y. (2020). The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature, 582(7811), 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1
      6. Lopes, L. & 2021. (2021, January 22). KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: January 2021. KFF. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/report/kff-covid-19-vaccine-monitor-january-2021/
      7. Mendez, A. (2020, July 22). Teaching Medical Students How to Combat Misinformation on Social Media [Text]. Medical School – University of Minnesota. https://med.umn.edu/news-events/teaching-medical-students-how-combat-misinformation-social-media
      8. Nejc, P. Musil, B. (2020). Full article: Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2021, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
      9. Ognyanova, K. (n.d.). THE STATE OF THE NATION:A 50-STATE COVID-19 SURVEY. 298. Ognyanova—THE STATE OF THE NATIONA 50-STATE COVID-19 SURVEY.pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2021, from http://www.kateto.net/COVID19%20CONSORTIUM%20REPORT%20April%202020.pdf
      1. Paakkari, L., & Okan, O. (2020). COVID-19: Health literacy is an underestimated problem. The Lancet. Public Health, 5(5), e249–e250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30086-4
      2. Randolph, H. E., & Barreiro, L. B. (2020). Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity, 52(5), 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.012
      3. Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (n.d.). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
      4. Schwartz, J. L. (2020). Evaluating and Deploying Covid-19 Vaccines—The Importance of Transparency, Scientific Integrity, and Public Trust. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(18), 1703–1705. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2026393
      5. Shadmi, E.. Health equity and COVID-19: Global perspectives | International Journal for Equity in Health | Full Text. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2021, from https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z
      6. Szmuda, T., Özdemir, C., Ali, S., Singh, A., Syed, M. T., & Słoniewski, P. (2020). Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A cross-sectional health literacy study. Public Health, 185, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.041
      7. The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government. (n.d.). OECD. Retrieved January 29, 2021, from http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-covid-19-managing-the-crisis-across-levels-of-government-d3e314e1/
      8. Trogen, B., Oshinsky, D., & Caplan, A. (2020). Adverse Consequences of Rushing a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: Implications for Public Trust. JAMA, 323(24), 2460. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8917

      Submitted by:

      Karen Khangura, OMS-II, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Amanda Ter Doest, OMS-III, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Amanda McMellon, OMS-III, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Maria Marasco, OMS-II, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Yamini Koyye, OMS-II, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Farheen Ghiasuddin, OMS-II, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Amber Lee, OMS-I, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Sydney Wilderman, OMS-1, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine

       

      Action Taken: [Leave Blank. Will be Approved by the House of Delegates or NotApproved.]

      Date:

      Effective Time Period: Ongoing

    • #3541
      Austin Smarsh<br>Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine
      Guest

      I’m writing to inquire as to the wording of the title and overall purpose of this resolution. I think that defining “health literacy” may be beneficial given the resolution is stated to have the aim of “Increasing Health Literacy” without stating how that might be accomplished. It makes me wonder if the aim of this resolution is to provide trusted, accessible, evidence-based COVID-19 information for COM students and surrounding communities or if the aim is to increase health literacy.

      In addition, this resolution discusses both COVID-19 misinformation uptake and variable trust of COVID-19 information based on demographics and beliefs. Are both of these factors directly related to health literacy levels and, if so, is there evidence to support?

      Finally, when it comes to uptake of health information, there is reason to believe that only providing information does not necessarily result in altered health behavior or increased perceived health literacy (i.e., providing patients with brochures on health conditions does not guarantee increased patient knowledge of the condition or health behaviors associated with the condition).

    • #3543
      Karen Khangura<br>ARCOM
      Guest

      Point of information from the author: During the open reference committee a question was brought up regarding why not have PHD’s from each COM distribute COVID information. I unfortunately did not have a great answer at the time so just wanted to address that here. The point of this resolution was to create a more cohesive response via all osteopathic schools in response to health literacy within each respective COMs community. Although students could ask PHDs from each school to create handouts there is no guarantee that would occur. I think SOMA has the opportunity to provide at least the basic information to each COM to allow each COM to consider whether they want to pursue this initiative. From there, students can determine whether they want to ask their faculty advisors for more information/ help with distributing information throughout the community. It also ensures that this actually happens when SOMA is providing the basics to students because it’s kick starting the process vs student’s first trying to find a faculty member to lead such a task.

    • #3552
      Briana Cervantes<br>MSUCOM
      Guest

      Speaking in behalf of my own opinions, I like the spirit of the resolution. I am concerned with its implementation. Who will be distributing these resources to the COMs? Who will be monitoring changes to vaccine schedules, preventative measures and treatments? Some of this information varies state by state. I would imagine this service requires a fiscal amount. I think this resolution can be modified to complete these goals if there is more elaboration on the methods.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The forum ‘Spring 2021 Resolution Forum’ is closed to new topics and replies.